"That School Where You Can't Be Gay" #2

Well, the presence of King's in the news over the Delwin Vriend case has indeed (as I suspected it would) continued. Last Sunday, Vriend himself weighed in in the Edmonton Journal, stating that (1) King's is a publically funded institution (a fact that, according to him, is "hushed up") but without "public accountability"; (2) King's did not have, neither at the time he was hired nor thereafter, a code of conduct; (3) Vriend's "boss" was aware that he was gay at the time of his hiring; and (4) that the court case was against the Alberta government, not the College. The latter point, along with the first, strongly implies that continued funding of private "religious" colleges by the Alberta government demonstrates that government's continued lack of recognition of the rights of GLBTs, despite the legal victory celebrated ten years ago. The Journal published today a response by Harry Fernhout, President of King's, which I think gives a good response to the only points he could have responded to (#1 and #4). I'm reprinting it here for those benefit of those with no access to the paper.

Delwin Vriend (“Albertans shouldn’t have to go to court for protection,” Letters, April 13) made a number of statements concerning The King's University College that require clarification.

Mr Vriend correctly points out that “no court case was ever fought against the college.” The King's University College has never contested court rulings at any level in Vriend v. the Queen. We agree that every citizen’s fundamental human rights must be protected, and we recognize the significance of the Supreme Court’s ruling in this case.

Mr Vriend’s claim that The King's University College receives public funding “without public accountability” is incorrect, however. King’s meets public accountability requirements very similar to those expected of fully funded public institutions. Our degree programs are subject to the same accreditation process through the Campus Alberta Quality Council. We meet the same financial reporting requirements, and must provide business plans and annual reports to the government just like the fully funded institutions. We have an open admission policy. The only substantive differences in accountability are that the Minister of Advanced Education and Technology does not appoint our governing board, and the Province does not own our campus. The Province provides partial instructional funding, in recognition of the public service we provide by educating Alberta citizens through accredited degree programs. The Province provides no capital funding for campus construction or maintenance.

There is nothing “hushed-up” about King’s funding and accountability; it is a matter of public record. We are strongly committed to contributing to the public good in higher education. One of our professors recently co-authored a science textbook for use in Alberta’s public high schools. Another recently received Canada’s highest teaching award because of his leadership in the scientific community. A third will soon be recognized for contributions to the music community in Edmonton. Since King’s inception in 1979, some 1700 students have graduated with approved degrees in the arts, sciences, commerce, music and education.They have entered the workforce or graduate programs in and beyond.

King’s has a long history of advocating on behalf of the disadvantaged and marginalized members of society locally and globally. Our research work is energized by concern for justice and sustainability, particularly with regard to poverty and the environment. King’s is strongly committed to making a constructive contribution to society as a partner in post-secondary education in Alberta.

Harry Fernhout, President
The King's University College

"Les Canadiens Sont La!"


We emigrated from the UK in 1967 (I was seven) and we settled in Toronto. The Leafs were the champs that year. But from the first time I saw them I was hooked on Les Canadiens. Maybe it was the colourful uniforms (bleu-blanc-et rouge as compared to the drab blue and white of the Leafs); maybe it was the passion of the fans (the Forum had an organ, a bugler named "Dutchy", and Roger Doucette who sometimes made up his own words to the national anthem, the Gardens had no music until the early seventies, and even then it was endless choruses of "The Maple Leaf Forever" on a very protestant-sounding Wurlitzer, and the same scratchy record of "O Canada" we listened to as part of our public school opening exercises); maybe it was the technicolour language and near cardiac gasping and groaning of Danny Gallivan (while the Leafs had the nasal intoning of Bill Hewitt); or maybe it was the storied, quasi-mythical history and tradition of the Flying Frenchmen. From an early age, I read voraciously everything I could get my hands on about the Canadiens. My favourites were the autobiographies of Rocket Richard and Jean Beliveau, and Andy O'Brien's "Firewagon Hockey", which I read over and over again.

Or maybe I just wanted to be different. The only Toronto team I supported growing up was the Blue Jays. The high points of my teen years were discovering Star Trek and watching the Canadiens kick Maple Leaf ass (see video above from April, 1978--btw this is not a power play!) again and again and again.

I could go on. It's in my blood, I'm afraid. I'll root for the Oilers... except for when they play the Habs. So I'm especially excited this spring... even though the shrine of Les Forum has given way to the hi-tech Centre Bell , Dutchy has long ago hung up his horn, Danny Gallivan and Roger Doucette have shed this mortal coil, and the Flying Frenchmen are more like the Rushing Russians.

Go Habs go!

"That School Where You Can't be Gay"

I'm gonna get on the soapbox.

It's been a frustrating week. I teach at King's University College, and we've been in the news every day from Sunday till today (and who knows about tomorrow and the next day). In 1991, Delwyn Vriend was dismissed from his position as a lab instructor at King's, ostensibly (at least this is the way the media puts it) "for being gay." Ten years ago this month, the government of Alberta (which refused to support Vriend's appeal) lost a Charter case on the matter. So now the rights of gays and lesbians not to be discriminated against by their employers is protected. And I think that's a wonderful thing.

There's a whole complex history behind the events which led up to Vriend's firing, including the increasing visibility of GLBT people in society and in the church, the desire of the local legal community for a Charter "test case" with which to challenge the Alberta Government's lack of recognition of the rights of GLBT people, and Vriend's own contention that the Christian community--and King's in particular--take a clear stand affirming the acceptance of GLBTs in the church. Adding to the complexity is the fact that King's was (and to an extent still is) supported by hard-working Dutch immigrants in Alberta and British Columbia (sometimes in stuff I've read about the case, mis-named "Dutch Reform"). This is itself a diverse community defying the simplistic, Manichean categorizations so beloved by the mass media: politically progressive in some ways, and conservative in others. Our "left wing" and "right wing" distinctions, which owe too much to the culture-wars discourse of the US, simply don't fit here. And--I say this with great affection as a long-time observer though not "insider"--members of this community love to argue amongst themselves about controversial political and social matters!

It was this community of post-war Dutch immigrants that built a Christian school system, not based on the superiority of the Christian faith but on the need for a plurality of perspectives within the educational sector and for a robust Christian witness therein. Partly from its experience as outsider to the largely Anglo culture that ran the country in the 60s and 70s, it taught its children to honour and respect cultural differences. (As someone raised in the Ontario public system of that time, I can testify to the anemic space given to "otherness" in my own schooling). It was this that enabled members of this community to stand behind aboriginal peoples and their struggles with "development" of their lands in 1970s Alberta. Sharing a commitment to caring for the earth as given by the Creator, it dissented from the idea of "limitless progress" pressed by the Trudeau government. And it's a community that reaches out especially to the weakest in society. Go to most any Christian Reformed church and you'll see "differently-abled" people as fully participating members of the community, not pushed to the background.

Doubtless this community was at the time uncomfortable with the presence of gays and lesbians in the institutions it supported, especially when sexual orientation was foregrounded to the extent it reportedly was by Vriend. While on this particular issue, the community remains divided, I strongly believe that many if not most of its members will eventually move toward acceptance for GLBT people. This won't be because of some thin, woolly liberal idea of "tolerance" or "live and let live", however, but because of its own "thicker" (in the Geertzian sense) history of marginality, the memory still borne by members whose families hid Jews during the Second World War, and its faith in the One whose ministry consisted in the embrace of social outcasts.

In short, the community that made, and continues to make King's and all the things it does possible (see below) has been, and remains, a community in dialogue and in process. While I'm not in a position to judge the actions of the College at the time of the Vriend firing, it certainly would have been extremely difficult for King's to have acted in any other way. Things would be very different today, as our current president has said.

Anyway, the thing that has frustrated me this week is that King's--then and now--is dismissed with the "that's the place where you can't be gay" appellation. (These very words were actually spoken to me by a cabbie the first week I was here. When I pressed him, he said, "Oh we studied all that in high school".) Even behind those four words repeated again and again in the media ("dismissed for being gay") there's a whole lot unsaid. And it especially doesn't help when the Canadian Family Action Coalition stands up for you in the letters section of the local paper!

Vriend still has friends at King's, though I think even his strongest supporters would concede that the events were manipulated behind the scenes in order to bring about the famous case of Vriend vs. Alberta. King's was simply a means to an end, just as Vriend is now a "symbol" of something he ultimately didn't control. The College was not part of the court case and to my knowledge has never contested the results. I've not done any formal polling, but I've yet to hear anyone at King's say that the recognition of the rights of GLBT people to be protected under the law, and therefore the 1998 decision, was a bad thing. Quite to the contrary. In fact, while the court case was going on, Citizens for Public Justice (a Christian advocacy group with similar cultural, philosophical, and theological roots to King's), was producing a document advocating the full legal equality of gays and lesbians under the law.

King's itself is a diverse institution: we have students from North America and Latin America, the Caribbean, Africa, and Asia. Many are Christian of one sort or another, some are not (last I heard, the ratio was about 70-30). I've taught Muslims (some of whom were among my best students), Hindus, new agers, and agnostics at King's. I've taught straight and gay students, and never heard anything other than support for the latter from the faculty and support staff. Contrary to some reports, King's is not formally associated with the Christian Reformed (or any other) Church. In fact, our faculty represent the spectrum of Christian churches: Anglican, United Church, Baptist, Roman Catholic, Ukrainian Catholic, Quaker, Pentecostal, Presbyterian, and Lutheran. Oh, and of course we have a good representation of Christian Reformed folk too! It's true that King's has a (minimal) statement of faith, but there is no formal code of conduct concerning sexual orientation or other matters--aside from expectations concerning relations with colleagues and students (put simply, it's a no-no to become involved with a student... surely a good thing, no?). King's is far more concerned that faculty demonstrate an understanding of their scholarly vocation as part of Christian discipleship (and I've yet to meet a colleague who thinks that means advocating "free markets", "family values", "creationism", or "intelligent design"). Our faculty participate fully in the "mainstream" of their disciplines--one of our faculty members just received a prestigious national teaching award and another has just co-published a science textbook for use in Alberta's public high schools. Last year we attained the highest rating among the Globe and Mail-polled Universities, largely because of our small classes, innovative teaching methods, and the personal attention we give to students. Faculty also contribute to the cultural and artistic life of Edmonton, and share their expertise on environmental and other issues. My colleague in political science is currently researching the ideology behind Alberta's thirst to exploit its natural resources at any cost. My colleague in economics works with Thabo Mbeki's New African Development initiative in South Africa. My colleague in sociology is involved in the development of men's resources within the city of Edmonton. I could go on and on. Students are active proponents of social and environmental justice, both locally and globally, and our guests on campus from the local social justice community have included Michael Phair, the openly gay city counsellor who helped advocate in the Vriend case.

I've worked, in one capacity or another, at five "secular" universities, and I would rate the scholarly atmosphere at King's as highly as any of them. Indeed, the fact that faculty share a common sense of vocation and the same understanding of academic community as service to the creation (and in that way imaging the creator), as well as our size, means we are free, at least in my experience, of the competitiveness within and between disciplines that dogs larger and more ideologically diverse institutions. King's is such a good place to work and teach that I've applied for (and, thanks be to God, been given) tenure. So I'm in for the long run. And I'm excited about it!

I think we deserve better than to be called "that school where you can't be gay."